In a story about infamous London gangster, Charlie Richardson, you might expect to hear about his rise to power, the struggles he had with rivals, set-ups for his ultimate fall when finally sent to jail; the film Charlie is not like this at all.
Lacking real focus, the film instead looks at anecdotes relating to the testimony given against him and, more often, other short tales of his criminal endeavours that are largely unrelated.
Although the film is clearly biased towards his version of events, we never really see a hero (or anti-hero) emerge, leaving the film sadly lacking in terms of character and plot. Certainly, we learn something of the man, but never enough to really make us care either way, no struggle, no interest.
While Luke Goss puts in a strong visual performance as the title role, his faux-cockney accent grates and ultimately taints the whole film.
Sub-par ganster action, but not entirely without merit.
Posted: April 7th, 2004
#Permalink: Charlie, By Gary Fleming
after 18 years in jail,would you not think like Mr Richardson.
# Posted by monty lane, on April 29th, 2004 at 3:49 pm
It’s hard to say, having never been in jail. One would hope that instead of trivialising one’s wrong-doings, that we would admit our crimes and try to move on.
# Posted by Gary Fleming, on May 1st, 2004 at 7:45 pm